GYIG OpenIR  > 矿床地球化学国家重点实验室
Genesis of the Huangshaping W–Mo–Cu–Pb–Zn polymetallic deposit in Southeastern Hunan Province, China: Constraints from fluid inclusions, trace elements, and isotopes
Li Xiaofeng; Huang Cheng; Wang Chunzeng; Wang Lifa
2016
发表期刊Ore Geology Reviews
卷号79页码:1-25
摘要

The Huangshaping polymetallic deposit is located in southeastern Hunan Province, China. It is a world-class W–Mo–Pb–Zn–Cu skarn deposit in the Nanling Range Metallogenic Belt, with estimated reserves of 74.31 Mt of W–Mo ore at 0.28% WO3and 0.07% Mo, 22.43 Mt of Pb–Zn ore at 3.6% Pb and 8.00% Zn, and 20.35 Mt of Cu ore at 1.12% Cu. The ore district is predominantly underlained by carbonate formations of the Lower Carboniferous period, with stocks of quartz porphyrygranite porphyry, and granophyre. Skarns occurred in contact zones between stocks and their carbonate wall rocks, which are spatially associated with the above-mentioned three types of ores (i.e., W–Mo, Pb–Zn, and Cu ores).

Three types of fluid inclusions have been identified in the ores of the Huangshaping deposit: aqueous liquid–vapor inclusions (Type I), daughter-mineral-bearing aqueous inclusions (Type II), and H2O–CO2 inclusions (Type III). Systematic microthermometrical, laser Raman spectroscopic, and salinity analyses indicate that high-temperature and high-salinity immiscible magmatic fluid is responsible for the W–Mo mineralization, whereas low-temperature and low-salinity magmatic-meteoric mixed fluid is responsible for the subsequent Pb–Zn mineralization. Another magmatic fluid derived from deep-rooted magma is responsible for Cu mineralization.

Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns and trace element features of calcites from W–Mo, Pb–Zn, and Cu ores are different from one another. Calcite from Cu ores is rich in heavy rare earth elements (187.4–190.5 ppm), Na (0.17%–0.19%), Bi (1.96–64.60 ppm), Y (113–135 ppm), and As (9.1–29.7 ppm), whereas calcite from W–Mo and Pb–Zn ores is rich in Mn (> 10.000 ppm) and Sr (178–248 ppm) with higher Sr/Y ratios (53.94–72.94). δ18O values also differ between W–Mo/Pb–Zn ores (δ18O = 8.10‰–8.41‰) and Cu ores (δ18O = 4.34‰–4.96‰), indicating that two sources of fluids were, respectively, involved in the W–Mo, Pb–Zn, and Cu mineralization.

Sulfur isotopes from sulfides also reveal that the large variation (4‰–19‰) within the Huangshaping deposit is likely due to a magmatic sulfur source with a contribution of reduced sulfate sulfur host in the Carboniferouslimestone/dolomite and more magmatic sulfur involved in the Cu mineralization than that in W–Mo and Pb–Zn mineralization. The lead isotopic data for sulfide (galena: 206Pb/204Pb = 18.48–19.19, 207/204Pb = 15.45–15.91, 208/204Pb = 38.95–39.78; sphalerite206Pb/204Pb = 18.54–19.03, 207/204Pb = 15.60–16.28, 208/204Pb = 38.62–40.27; molybdenite206Pb/204Pb = 18.45–19.21, 207/204Pb = 15.53–15.95, 208/204Pb = 38.77–39.58 chalcopyrite206Pb/204Pb = 18.67–19.38, 207/204Pb = 15.76–19.90, and 208/204Pb = 39.13–39.56) and oxide (scheelite: 206Pb/204Pb = 18.57–19.46, 207/204Pb = 15.71–15.77, 208/204Pb = 38.95–39.13) are different from those of the wall rock limestone (206Pb/204Pb = 18.34–18.60, 207/204Pb = 15.49–15.69, 208/204Pb = 38.57–38.88) and porphyries (206Pb/204Pb = 17.88–18.66, 207/204Pb = 15.59–15.69, 208/204Pb = 38.22–38.83), suggesting Pb206-, U238-, and Th 232-rich material are involved in the mineralization. The Sm–Nd isotopes of scheelite (εNd(t) = − 6.1 to − 2.9), garnet (εNd(t) = − 6.8 to − 6.1), and calcite (εNd(t) = − 6.3) from W–Mo ores as well as calcite (εNd(t) = − 5.4 to − 5.3) and scheelite (εNd(t) = − 2.9) from the Cu ores demonstrate suggest more mantle-derived materials involved in the Cu mineralization.

In the present study we conclude that two sources of ore-forming fluids were involved in production of the Huangshaping W–Mo–Pb–Zn–Cu deposit. One is associated with the granite porphyry magmas responsible for the W–Mo and then Pb–Zn mineralization during which its fluid evolved from magmatic immiscible to a magmatic–meteoritic mixing, and the other is derived from deep-rooted magma, which is related to Cu-related mineralization.

关键词W–mo–cu–pb–zn Deposit fluid Inclusions trace Elements isotopes skarnhuangshaping south China
收录类别SCI
语种英语
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.gyig.ac.cn/handle/42920512-1/9610
专题矿床地球化学国家重点实验室
作者单位1.Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
2.College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3.Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550002, China
4.Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China
5.University of Maine at Presque Isle, Presque Isle, ME 04769, USA
6.Huangshaping Mine Company, Chenzhou 424421, China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Li Xiaofeng,Huang Cheng,Wang Chunzeng,等. Genesis of the Huangshaping W–Mo–Cu–Pb–Zn polymetallic deposit in Southeastern Hunan Province, China: Constraints from fluid inclusions, trace elements, and isotopes[J]. Ore Geology Reviews,2016,79:1-25.
APA Li Xiaofeng,Huang Cheng,Wang Chunzeng,&Wang Lifa.(2016).Genesis of the Huangshaping W–Mo–Cu–Pb–Zn polymetallic deposit in Southeastern Hunan Province, China: Constraints from fluid inclusions, trace elements, and isotopes.Ore Geology Reviews,79,1-25.
MLA Li Xiaofeng,et al."Genesis of the Huangshaping W–Mo–Cu–Pb–Zn polymetallic deposit in Southeastern Hunan Province, China: Constraints from fluid inclusions, trace elements, and isotopes".Ore Geology Reviews 79(2016):1-25.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Genesis of the Huang(4871KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SA浏览 请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Li Xiaofeng]的文章
[Huang Cheng]的文章
[Wang Chunzeng]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Li Xiaofeng]的文章
[Huang Cheng]的文章
[Wang Chunzeng]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Li Xiaofeng]的文章
[Huang Cheng]的文章
[Wang Chunzeng]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Genesis of the Huangshaping W–Mo–Cu–Pb–Zn polymetallic deposit in Southeastern Hunan Province, China.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。